Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O-Gon Kwon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep as per consensus and the absence of deletion calls beyond the nominator. Non-admin closure. Warrah (talk) 00:29, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

O-Gon Kwon

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Appears to be WP:BLP1E. Can't find anything else terribly notable about this judge in reliable sources. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 02:11, 10 April 2010 (UTC) ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 02:11, 10 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep I can see why you'd think BLP1E, but he appears to have presided over two landmark trials and won an award from the President of Korea. That sound like evidence of notability to me. ALI nom nom 02:21, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment The "Moran Medal" appears to be given to many people for civil merit, and not highly notable. In fact, the "Moran" is a 2nd class medal.  The 1st class is called the "Mugunghwa Medal."  In terms of judging trials, that is just a normal activity for any judge.  The media coverage just mentions him in passing as a judge of those trials - that is not something unique for a judge.  ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 04:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep as per ali --Tmckeage (talk) 07:32, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Noted judge in internationally prominent case - mentioned in the international press - recognised as notable by the Moran medal. (Msrasnw (talk) 09:24, 10 April 2010 (UTC))
 * Comment The bulk of the material added in an attempt to establish notability in this diff is not about O-Gon Kwon.  It is about the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and about the Srebrenica’s massacre.  While that content may be appropriate for articles on those topics, it appears to highlight the fact that O-Gon Kwon has notability from WP:BLP1E.  The bulk of coverage of the tribunal and the trials associated with it either make no reference to Kwon, or mention him in passing as a judge associated with it.  There appears to not be enough unique information highlighting his specific notability other than passing references associated with these. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:21, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:59, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Being a judge of such seniority is notable. Notable in the sense of "worthy of note". Sources that verify his judicial positions are sufficient to form the basis of an article. --Mkativerata (talk) 17:31, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep as per User: ali. Also his contrubutions and accomplishments at the national and international level is highly noteworthy. Steve Quinn (formerly Ti-30X) (talk) 23:34, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.