Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O-Luv


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 02:38, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

O-Luv

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia isn't a crystall ball, enough said. I'm surprised the article survived for the last 3 months. Spellcast 05:45, 29 September 2007 (UTC) Jake the Editor Man 13:31, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Blatantly against Wikipedia is not a crystal ball (at WP:NOT).


 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL; it can always be restored if a release date is confirmed and there are some sources for the content of the article. --Paul Erik 16:19, 29 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete, very obvious WP:CRYSTAL violation, no release date, no sources, all speculation. shoeofdeath 02:39, 5 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.