Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O-index


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 16:06, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

O-index

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article relies only on a single primary source, an article published very recently and listed as having zero citations by Google scholar. (The Hirsch source listed by the article is not about the O-index, but about a much more notable and earlier topic that the O-index is intended to supplant.) As such its subject fails WP:GNG as it is not the subject of in-depth coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources. It was prodded in early November but quickly deprodded by one of the two single-purpose accounts (who has confirmed himself to be J.F.F. Mendes, one of the authors of the original/only publication on this topic) and  that created and maintain this article; see also the history of the associated article José Fernando Ferreira Mendes for other possibly-related single-purpose accounts  and  (but note that Mendes himself is clearly notable). —David Eppstein (talk) 23:27, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator, it fails the WP:GNG. FuriouslySerene (talk) 14:38, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:11, 3 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete on clear rationale of nominator. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:19, 3 December 2015 (UTC).
 * Delete per nom. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 07:55, 4 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.