Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O.G. Mudbone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  deleted (CSD G11) by Fastily. NAC. Cliff smith talk  06:22, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

O.G. Mudbone

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not meet the notability requirements of WP:PORNBIO. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 22:04, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

On the contrary Backslash, WP:PORNBIO states that if the subject "Has made unique contributions to a specific pornographic genre, such as beginning a trend in pornography..." then he / she is qualified to be recognized. He is starting a trend, he is merging comedy with a young energetic African-American lifestyle while having intercourse. The absurdity of his movies also make them astoundingly unique. Though he hasn't been in the business long enough to be recognized with an award, he has definitely made unique contributions to the hard-core pornographic genre. \ Davisman123 / (talk) 22:23, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Do you have any reliable, published sources that can be used to substantiate these claims? Facebook and a forum posting are not considered reliable sources for Wikipedia articles: if you could find news/magazine articles about this porn star or reviews of his work, that will help the keep case significantly. If not, the article should be deleted due to the lack of reliable sources. -- saberwyn 23:54, 21 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as unsalvageable spam. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 22:47, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.