Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OASC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Sam Blanning(talk) 11:51, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

OASC
The subject MIGHT be notable (most of the Google hits for OASC don't relate to this and when searching for what the full name is, it's only 84 Google hits), but this article doesn't express notability for it or provide sources of its use. Instead, it is a diary or step-by-step guide of what to expect. I prodded it as Wikipedia is not a how-to guide, but it was removed by the article's creator saying it wasn't. Metros232 16:44, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. As written, this article is a how-to guide. I'd not oppose this being completely re-written to describe what OASC is. But as written, this article is a subjective, second-person perspective brochure to prepare candidates for OASC. Not encyclopedic. Scorpiondollprincess 16:51, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, provided a complete rewrite that presents the facts only in an enyclopediac manner, even if only a stub. Fabricationary 17:14, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom as a how-to guide. Also no notability shown for anyone not interested in passing the OASC.  Tychocat 17:46, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge if we get rid of the minutae of the article, merge what is left into RAF College Cranwell -- MrDolomite | Talk 19:10, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep or Merge I'd considered applying a prod when I first saw this one, but this does seem legitimately notable. It is definitely in need of cleanup and trimming, but I believe there is something decent to be said about the topic. GassyGuy 07:33, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge the two sentences worth of actual content into RAF College Cranwell. Eluchil404 20:31, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge per above. If kept, it should be renamed to Officer and Aircrew Selection Centre processing or something similar.  Vegaswikian 05:14, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
 * keep please it does seem legitimately notable Yuckfoo 19:54, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.