Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OCC-1


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  10:21, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

OCC-1

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An article about a gene (I think) and shows no evidence of passing WP:GNG Sports Devotee (talk) 05:40, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:13, 25 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment This really needs a expert. The average person has no idea what this article is, so even if this is kept, it has to be cleaned up. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 17:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Leaning towards delete. The handful of sources that mention OCC-1 or C12orf75 seem to talk about overexpressed mRNA, so I'd say that this is a gene. However, I cannot find any review/secondary source on pubmed or gscholar, so WP:MEDRS-wise, this article fails GNG. Looks like it is still WP:TOOSOON for this gene. - HyperGaruda (talk) 18:19, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment This really needs a expert, and I have added a tag for that expert in Molecular and Cell Biology.--DThomsen8 (talk) 00:41, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - This is an open reading frame which is an area of DNA that has the potential to be a gene but has not been proven to be one yet. There is no entry on OMIM and only one article comes up on Pubmed which only befiefly mentions it in the abstract and nowhere else. It's too soon for an article. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:12, 3 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.