Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OECD Public Governance Reviews


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Nobody supports retention. The author is thanked for their conribution but also asked to read our policies WP:NOR and WP:V.  Sandstein  06:14, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

OECD Public Governance Reviews

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Huge, reflective commentary. WP:OR essay. Basa lisk inspect damage⁄berate 15:24, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 00:59, 3 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 15:58, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Actually, it's an attempt at an encyclopaedia article written by what appears to be the Justin Kavanagh who works in the GOV directorate of the OECD. The problem is that M. Kavanagh clearly knows things that haven't been properly written down and published outwith Wikipedia.  There is published documentation of the OECD's Reviews, in  for example.  But it doesn't support quite a lot of this content. Uncle G (talk) 17:36, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:31, 16 July 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.