Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OFM-Quinta da Lixa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  20:31, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

OFM-Quinta da Lixa

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Only one reference in the article. Buzzards-Watch Me Work (talk) 02:52, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep One ref does not equate to non-notable. Suggest the nominator withdraws this and reads WP:BEFORE.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 09:59, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, as Lugnuts stated above, having only one reference doesn't mean that the article lacks notability.  -Fim atic   (talk &#124; contribs) 17:46, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per Lugnuts and Fimatic. References adedd. Rpo.castro (talk) 21:09, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, as Lugnuts  says, only one ref does not equate to non-notable. (if so, a million articles should be deleted) Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 09:09, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cycling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.