Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OGZA


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was deleted as recreation of previously deleted material. - Mgm|(talk) 12:31, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

OGZA
Vanity cruft. Should be a CSD but tragically isn't. Delete. — Phil Welch 05:09, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

Agreed, I first suggested to Delete. Somebody put a lot of work into it, but Wikipedia is not the appropriate home for it. It is an orphan page with no wiki links in or out and appears to be of no significance. Hu 05:17, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment This has (essentially) already failed an AfD: Articles for deletion/Ogza but the name is now written in all caps. --W.marsh 05:18, 10 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Perhaps "failed" is confusing me. The original AfD seems to have succeeded because there was a unanimous vote to delete.  Then it was supposedly deleted according to the page.  Now it has reappeared.  The vote was late October.  But the article history shows the new one with title in all caps was created in September. Kill this zombie sucker and make it stay dead. Hu 05:35, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Hmm. I see it as failing the vote if everyone votes to delete... I guess it's semantics.  I'm not really sure what it means that this was voted to be deleted under a very similar name... if nothing else it sets a good precedent to vote Delete (again).  --W.marsh 06:08, 10 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete. I would argue that the content of the article, not simply the title, has already failed an AfD... thus it is a CSD. Edwardian 08:35, 10 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete as WP:NOT
 * Speedy delete as recreation of previously deleted material. (I was the one who deleted it.) &mdash; J I P | Talk 10:51, 10 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.