Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OMAR MALCOLM


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Renata (talk) 01:12, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

OMAR MALCOLM

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Nowhere does this article actually establish anything of importance or consequence that he has accomplished, except some unsourced generic praise. The closest it approaches to demonstrating notability is mentioning he belongs to some political groups in which it is ambiguously asserted somebody may have said good things about him at some point somewhere. Vianello (talk) 00:03, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete, A7, no importance asserted. Just another kid making a vanity article about themselves. Redfarmer (talk) 00:05, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Concurrence. I made this a benefit-of-a-doubt AfD simply because I felt someone COULD argue the decent placings in literary competitions could be notable (even though I wouldn't say so myself). I might have been less charitable if I had immediately noticed it was a vanity article, but, so it goes. - Vianello (talk) 00:07, 25 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete, I listed it for speedy deletion, it's just vanity about an nn person.  Little Red Riding Hood  talk  00:08, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: No references provided, seems like a copy & paste from another website. Newport Beach (talk) 00:10, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
 * speedy delete - obviously a young person playing around and wrote an article about themselves and how they expect to be important in the future. No references, no article. Pretty funny how the person is supposed to be an important member of the Republican Party yet isn't old enough to vote. Jason Quinn (talk) 00:31, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
 * He's 18, that's old enough to vote.  Little Red Riding Hood  talk  01:05, 25 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.