Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OMA PAG


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:49, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

OMA PAG

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Possibly dissolved sub-group of the OMA. A few passing mentions don't add up to notability for an own article. If the group still exists (not sure, I found only old Google hits and the group is no longer mentioned on OMA's summary list of groups), a brief mention in the main article would be sufficient. GermanJoe (talk) 22:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete and mention at main article as there are no good significant and notable sources talking about this. Searches find results here, here and here but nothing good. SwisterTwister   talk  05:50, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:05, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:05, 4 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Unsourced (the only source given in the article does not list OMA PAG), unnecessary content fork, group (if it did something) can be mentioned at OMA. Kraxler (talk) 16:20, 9 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.