Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ONYC Hair


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe deckertalk 07:39, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

ONYC Hair

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement." It was deprodded by User:117.251.255.47 with the following rationale "I am working on the issue of references. Please give me some weeks to collect more information". Two weeks have passed, no refs have been added, and I see nothing but press releases, and passing coverage in trade journals. As I discussed in my Signpost Op-Ed, this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:21, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    11:46, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    11:47, 13 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as there's nothing for a better article at this time. SwisterTwister   talk  23:17, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. NOT DIRECTORY.  DGG ( talk ) 02:28, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per others, appears to be article spam with little encyclopedic value. Citobun (talk) 07:20, 16 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.