Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OPOV


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Mailer Diablo 01:12, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

OPOV
This recently added article is for a relatively obscure and undefined neologism/initialism. While there are some 16K online instances of the term, they refer to "open" or "omniscient point of view", not "obsessive", "One Person, One Vote", et al. The case for retrofitting this article into a dab is, similarly, questionable. Of course: this, in and of itself, might be an OPOV ... no matter which way you skin this cat. :) E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 23:21, 14 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as nominator. E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 23:21, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete -- NN, neologism, probably comes under WP:NPA as well. Haikupoet 02:48, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, many possible reasons, including dicdef, lack of context, non-notable/unstable neologism, protologism, etc. Stifle 11:47, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable unverifiable neologism; whole phrase has only 86 Google matches and none also contain the abbreviation. -- Mithent 18:51, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO.  dbtfz talk 06:08, 17 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.