Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ORMLite


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Data access object. (non-admin closure) -- Dane 2007  talk 01:57, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

ORMLite

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I still confirm both of my PRODs, the 1st one was removed by a new user; there's nothing at all suggesting actual independent substance and notability. SwisterTwister  talk  00:24, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  00:24, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  00:24, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:27, 8 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment – Below is a book source found using the Google Books link atop this discussion. While the source does have technical "how-to" content, it also provides a great deal of significant coverage about the application itself. North America1000 00:31, 8 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect -- to Data access object (change from Delete per note below). The content can be easily found at http://ormlite.com/; not sure why there needs to be an encyclopedia entry. Sources not there to establish notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:03, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Data access object. As included in a previous version of the article and as Northamerica1000 pointed out above, there is chapter in a book on this, so I consider the software verifiable. I wasn't able to find multiple RS, so I don't think it is notable. Hence, back in June I selectively merged a brief description to Data access object. Restoring the redirect is the best course here. --Mark viking (talk) 20:52, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect per the above notions. North America1000 03:04, 13 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.