Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OTER


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Reliable sources have been found. Deletion concerns have been addressed. (non-admin closure) Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  00:30, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

OTER

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article does not meeet Wikipedia notability guidelines, has no references, only a single line of text and no explaination of the topic it covers. I therefore think it qualifies for deletion. Anjwalker  Talk 04:36, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep It's mentioned in reliable sources , and statewide government agencies are normally notable. Alessandra Napolitano (talk) 04:52, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. If this article is kept, it should probably be moved to the spelled-out version of the name. It also needs more content; it's almost a WP:CSD candidate for speedy deletion due to its lack of content at this point. I'm not going to tag it for speedy deletion, but I can imagine that some editors might do so. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:32, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 6 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. Article is awful, but an Energy regulator in a Federal Australian territory is a sufficiently notable office.  Agree with Metropolitan that it should be moved to the fully spelled out name. --Legis (talk - contribs) 08:49, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per Alessandra. --99of9 (talk) 22:48, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. Since the discussion appears to have reach a conclusion, could an administrator please close and review this?. Anjwalker   Talk 10:49, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.