Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OTH Veterans Services


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:07, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

OTH Veterans Services

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Borderline speedyable article about a non-notable charitable organization founded by a non-notable rapper whose article is also up for deletion. Zero third party sources to indicate how this organization is notable. Prod was disputed by creator. OhNo itsJamie Talk 03:10, 26 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment Indeed the Colorado Gazette citation isn't about the organization. The only source is the organization's own wordpress "blog" as they call this format. I also found this where a funding of a thousand dollars was sought last November on GoFundMe but only $20 was donated. The goal is noble but the notability doesn't seem to be there. --Mr. Magoo and McBarker (talk) 03:37, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - If you travel via way of the editor who created the article>his sockpuppets>sockpuppet's user page history, you find the founder of this organization put up this Wikipedia article covering this organization. So allot of WP:COI/WP:PROMOTION/WP:NOTWEBHOST going on here. Zero sources other than himself means this has to go. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 20:45, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:32, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    20:41, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    20:41, 2 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as none of this suggests a better notable article. SwisterTwister   talk  02:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.