Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oak Manufacturing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. JForget 23:47, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Oak Manufacturing

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

fails general notability guidelines Jujutacular talkcontribs 13:35, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Delete as per nom with work article could be improved and WP:NOTE could be established...   RP459 (talk) 18:57, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm all for keeping it if notability is established. Unfortunately it hasn't been established and I couldn't find anything that would do so. Jujutacular talkcontribs 13:06, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * CommentI agree, and I have not had the time to do any research myself. RP459 (talk) 14:38, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:01, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. I was ready to !vote delete, but then I recognized the logo on the picture in the article. The company's machines were ubiquitous for many years. The company (which is still active and reported, see ) may be low-profile and in a niche market, but being hard to write a well-sourced article about isn't the same as being non-notable. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 14:19, 6 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep These items are definitely ubiquitous. Not exactly sexy items, but that's precisely why they deserve a mention here—not very likely someone interested in them is going to find much elsewhere.-- SPhilbrick  T  18:10, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
 * keep Notability is asserted even if not established by citations. Improve, not delete. Hmains (talk) 17:51, 8 August 2009 (UTC)


 * keep per all stated aboveOo7565 (talk) 18:26, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.