Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oakland Marriott City Center


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR. I'm not sure whether you intended your comment as a "keep" !vote. If not, and you wouldn't mind this article being deleted, then I can delete this under soft deletion as a lightly participated, uncontested AfD. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 03:33, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * After hearing nothing from Ferrari250, I have soft deleted the article. It may be restored upon request. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 03:19, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Oakland Marriott City Center

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

References, yes. But not good enough to persuade me that this hotel is in any way notable. TheLongTone (talk) 15:58, 16 December 2016 (UTC)


 * * I was looking at this through the lens of someone living in Oakland and viewing this category: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Buildings_and_structures_in_Oakland,_California. It's the largest hotel and only convention center in the city. There are a lot of buildings on the list missing, I had planned to add most of these that are missing: https://www.emporis.com/statistics/tallest-buildings/city/102062/oakland-ca-usa (AT&T, Park Bellevue Tower, St Paul's Tower). If this isn't in the spirit of wikipedia, let me know on my talk page and I will stop adding buildings in Oakland. Ferrari250 (talk) 17:25, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:39, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:31, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:34, 23 December 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:40, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Concur with nom. Nothing to establish that this hotel is notable. MB 04:18, 2 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.