Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oasis Entertainment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete since no reliable sources have been provided.--Wafulz 03:50, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Oasis Entertainment

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Record label of questionable notabilty; blatant conflict of interest. Also nominating the record label's owner:
 * Yechiel Man 17:08, 12 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep. Looked at their site. Appears to be religious.--Edtropolis 18:24, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions.   -- --  pb30 < talk > 20:55, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 09:42, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as it lists artists that it records, who are notable. It needs a lot of cleaning up, though. Bearian 00:34, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article does not prove the notability of the label and notability by association is insufficient grounds for retaining the article in the absence of reliable third-party sources to verify the content. -- Black Falcon (Talk) 19:26, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete - This company hasn't put out records – they took an album, American Hotel, that had already been produced and marketed it. Not only that, they didn't market it very well because it's difficult to find anything about that album except from MySpace and this company's webpage. Cavener is even less notable than Oasis Entertainment; trust me, if Cavener had worked with Barenaked Ladies on anything other than the Juno Awards, I would have the recording. That's original research, but it's really, really thorough original research. ;-) - Krakatoa  Katie  05:31, 20 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.