Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obelux


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 15:22, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Obelux

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

The article appears to fail to meet WP:ORG. There are no significant matches in Google News or any in Google Books. this article briefly mentions one product that may become notable but it is not yet in production and would thus fail WP:FUTURE. PROD raised but deleted by creator without discussion, merge seems unsuitable, so raising to encourage wider discussion. Fæ (talk) 10:21, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- Fæ (talk) 10:23, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions.  -- Fæ (talk) 10:23, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is a business that makes LEDs.  Unless there's some kind of showing that they have some kind of historical or technological significance in the history of making or finding uses for LEDs, they should not get a standalone encyclopedia article. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 20:32, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:CORP. Would require more secondary sources to establish encyclopedic notability. --hydrox (talk) 12:18, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.