Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oberfucking


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. per WP:SNOW and WP:SK. De facto withdrawn nomination as nom has conceded legitimacy. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 10:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Oberfucking

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The name makes me wonder whether this place really exists or if this is a joke. –BuickCenturyDriver 06:57, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Real place, as shown here from a reliable - verifiable - thrid party source.  As such, meets our guidelines for inclusion.  Who would have believed? ShoesssS Talk 07:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Fucking, Austria. &mdash; Sebastian 07:41, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Changed to Keep per Tim Song. &mdash; Sebastian 09:40, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Real place. Redirecting is inappropriate since we are talking about two quite different places. See . Tim Song (talk) 07:54, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Suggest speedy keep, in that two independent sources validate the existence of the village and as such a de facto notability Keep. Thanks. ShoesssS Talk 08:00, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Looks like this is legit but it still makes me wonder why someone would give a such a title to a town. –BuickCenturyDriver 08:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - You are thinking in modern day English, not German and or the time period. The towns were named before the English connotation of the word was even though of.  Remember, it is a big world out there.  What we consider as trivia another country or culture would consider as important.  Likewise with customs and traditions.   ShoesssS Talk
 * Comment: This AfD should be cited as an example of why no editor should file one without going over WP:BEFORE.  RGTraynor  10:38, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * LOL Yeah, I know, this discussion is closed, but this was ridiculous to begin with. &mdash;  Rickyrab | Talk 12:52, 7 September 2009 (UTC)