Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obigo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Obigo Browser. Consensus seems to hold that the company is not in itself sufficiently notable. I'd emphasise Christopher Connor's point that the browser itself is certainly ambiguous in its notability, and would suggest that the target article should probably receive additional sourcing to avoid deletion itself. ~ mazca  talk 11:45, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Obigo

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Does not appear to meet notability requirements and lacks third party sources. Eeekster (talk) 21:27, 31 July 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: the article is about the company. The Obigo software suite appears notable.  Perhaps the article could be rewritten??--Elen of the Roads (talk) 22:28, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - More crap advertising, as nearly as I can tell. Carrite (talk) 02:20, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep if Obigo Browser is merged into it. The company itself seems notable only for that one product, but there isn't much, if any, coverage of the company itself when not associated with the browser. Merging the two would bring notability to the result article, but the company article isn't notable enough to exist by itself. --Slon02 (talk) 19:41, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Then I think you have it backwards; if the product is notable, but the company isn't, then the company should only be discussed in relation to its product. I don't see a compelling reason to do it the other way.  So merge to Obigo Browser.  postdlf (talk) 15:02, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Merge. Due to lack of notability independent of the browser (which it itself possibly non-notable). Christopher Connor (talk) 20:56, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.