Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obina Carrick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:44, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Obina Carrick

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable footballer, who has somehow moved from a top flight Nigerian team to a minor New Zealand team. Article claims two appearances for a team in the Nigerian top flight team, but I do not believe this to be true. a google search brings back only six hits, all for WP or mirrors. Seems to inherently fail WP:GNG regardless of the veracity of his appearances in a fully professional league. Lack of google hits suggests to me a fake player. Fenix down (talk) 14:54, 21 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:18, 21 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nom. He has not received significant coverage or played in a fully pro league. This means that the article fails WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:18, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 15:32, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a WP:HOAX, there is no such player. There is a Brazilian pro player named Obina, this is definitely not him. § FreeRangeFrog 21:05, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 22 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - article is about a footballer who hasn't played in a fully pro league or represented his country in at senior level, which means that the article fails WP:NFOOTY. Also fails WP:GNG due to lack of coverage in reliable sources. Mentoz86 (talk) 17:52, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of notability. —chaos5023 (talk) 22:38, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.