Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obinwanne Okeke


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This article is 99% promotional nonsense. That said, I'm not thrilled about deleting it. Aside from the obvious systemic bias concerns, I think it is not unreasonable to argue that appearing on the Forbes 30 Under 30 List passes the bar of the general notability guideline, however modestly. That said, no editors have seen fit to make such an argument in the discussion below. Combined with the obvious promotional nature of the article (which even includes dates for future speaking engagements), I think it is entirely within policy to delete. No prejudice against the article re-eappearing with a more modest length and encyclopedic tone.  A  Train ''talk 10:36, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Obinwanne Okeke

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I've declined a speedy request on this as IMO it's not irredeemable spam, and there do appear to be some sources out there. However, I'm not convinced this is actually salvageable, so bringing it here for further opinions. Procedural AfD so I abstain. &#8209; Iridescent 18:24, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   18:35, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   18:35, 28 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as a case of WP:PROMO as it is not neutral and praises the subject in the voice of Wikipedia. As he may be notable IMO it would be best for this version to go and a new version started in draftspacee and going through the WP:AFC process Atlantic306 (talk) 15:40, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak delete I partially agree with Atlantic306. A new unbiased, non WP:PROMO version should come through. But it can also be worked on current article without deleting it. — usernamekiran (talk)  22:52, 29 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.