Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obiwu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Nomination withdrawn by nominator (non-admin closure) &#124;  Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  22:58, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Obiwu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject of the article fails WP:GNG. I can't find that evidence of notability. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 21:01, 20 December 2015 (UTC) Nomination Withdrawn. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 06:39, 3 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:GNG. --Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) 23:45, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Article should no longer be deleted as it has been updated with new information and linked to related pages. 1buRi6hw4n (talk) 12:18, 26 December 2015 (UTC) — 1buRi6hw4n (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:08, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:10, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:10, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:11, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:11, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:11, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete for now and draft and userfy if needed as my searches only found a few links here and there at Books, News and browsers. SwisterTwister   talk  06:55, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article is rich in offline sources and links. Suggest areas of improvement, if necessary.Anombano (talk) 18:27, 27 December 2015 (UTC) — Anombano (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Weak keep. The article is heavily larded with Wikipuffery, sources that don't mention the subject, sources by rather than about the subject, or sources that mention him only trivially. But the Akubuiro piece (repeated as references 3, 19) is an in-depth profile of the subject that appears to be reliably published, and the News Ghana piece (reference 12) is an in-depth review of a book of his poetry. That may be enough for WP:GNG if not for WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:40, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:16, 3 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - clearly a notable person demonstrated by the secondary sources. I checked out a sample of the references. An article on this man would improve the encyclopedia. Best Regards,  Bfpage &#124;leave a message 01:29, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep For a relatively minor writer and scholar, this seems to have decent sourcing. He meets criteria for notability. Dimadick (talk) 09:59, 3 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.