Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ObjectVideo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Tito xd (?!? - help us) 05:18, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

ObjectVideo
Non notable Tony Bruguier 18:54, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Looks notable from a Google search.  --Allen 20:11, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Not very notable from a google search (451 unique hits). The company's website has an alexa rank of 720,404. However, google news does returns 20 hits, and the website makes some fairly notable claims. Nevertheless, I do not believe that articles should remain where their notability is questionable and the article itself fails to assert or verify that notability. When a good article on the company comes along, let's (maybe) keep that.--Fuhghettaboutit 21:10, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

''This AfD is being relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that a decision may usefully be reached. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!'' Mailer Diablo 15:23, 24 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per Fug; no evidence of satisfying WP:CORP. RGTraynor 15:53, 24 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as possible spam. Mangojuice 15:55, 24 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.