Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Object model reference


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Courcelles (talk) 13:06, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Object model reference

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Taking this to AfD as I am not a programming expert, but is this even a thing? The original version of this page, from 2004, was a copyvio from the manual for JeeWiz, an old Java code generator. Googling suggests that the term is used elsewhere, but I don't know whether all of that is referring to the same concept, or whether the concept is standalone and not already covered by object-oriented programming and/or software documentation. Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:21, 5 March 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:04, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:33, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Looks like it might be a generic term for any reference that describes an object model, in which case this is a WP:DICDEF. ■ ∃ Madeline ⇔ ∃ Part of me ; 20:01, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per the above. ■ ∃ Madeline ⇔ ∃ Part of me ; 07:41, 12 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.