Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Objectifs - Centre for Photography & Filmmaking


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 13:47, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Objectifs - Centre for Photography & Filmmaking

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable organisation per WP:ORG. 15 Google hits for , and coverage in cited sources and , are just passing mentions of the organisation. In other words, 90% of this article is unsourced despite the citations given.

The author of the page objected to the proposed deletion on the talk page, but he misses the point in that I'm not saying having 15 Google hits automatically condemns the subject to non-notability - the point was that there are no sources that corroborate the information given in the article. Apparently this lack of detailed coverage of the organisation extends to even the local papers - a Factiva search of Singapore press sources shows 83 hits going back to 2003, mostly in The Straits Times, but they're all brief mentions of the organisation's name in "upcoming arts events" listings, without detailed description of the organisation itself. &mdash;Resurgent insurgent 2007-04-23 10:28Z 


 * Delete Internet imperialism aside, the sources provided in this article do not assert notability. I would be willing to change my vote if some reliable sources could be produced. --  Cy ru s      An dir on   [[Image:Flag_of_Indiana.svg|24px]] 17:41, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. User:Revolutionnaire should understand that notability here refers to the fact that the Objectifs center has not been shown to have recieved the kind of treatment in secondary sources that could be the basis for an encyclopedia article. nadav 08:44, 24 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment. This article was written as part of the NUS Scholars Programme project. nadav 08:46, 24 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.