Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oblivion keyblade


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete, then redirect. Mailer Diablo 15:37, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Oblivion keyblade
not notable Reid A. 04:22, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as derivative fancruft on minutia. I checked the linked game article and that already talks about the keyblade so no need to merge this wee stub.--Fuhghettaboutit 04:32, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Kingdom Hearts. It's notable enough to be included in an article, and quite possibly the image should be in the Kingdom Hearts article, but otherwise this hasn't made much of an impact on the human race. Captainktainer * Talk 04:37, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Captainktainer. Gw e rnol 04:52, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as somebody who actually edits the Kingdom Hearts articles. This is simply one weapon of many in the game. The image is worthless. Please don't make the article any worse by merging fancruft to it. '  (Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!) 04:59, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Captainktainer. Sorry Guy 05:42, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Apostrophe. --[[Image:Flag of India.svg|20px]]Srik e it ( talk ¦  ✉  ) '' 11:31, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Apostrophe. The Kingdom Hearts games have a bunch of "keyblade" weapons, of which this is one. I believe Kingdom Hearts II has on the order of ten or twenty of them. It's not especially notable within the game, and definitely not notable in and of itself. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 12:08, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect per User:Captainktainer. J I P  | Talk 18:27, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * merge to Kingdom Hearts per above. --Bachrach44 20:25, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Tell me how exactly this fancruft would improve the Kingdom Hearts article. It won't. '  (Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!) 03:39, 8 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.