Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Observation lounge (Star Trek)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 03:38, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Observation lounge (Star Trek)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Even less notable that the subject of this AFD. Unsourced, no assertion of notability, merely plot summary. --EEMeltonIV 05:13, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nomination says everything that needed to be said. OfficeGirl 05:45, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - I love Star Trek, but this is too trivial for even my taste.--Danaman5 06:12, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Perhaps someday we an have a article about the Argos' starboard. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  06:35, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete As it is not notable and the prose is original research. Pedro | Chat  07:41, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletions.   -- the wub  "?!"  14:33, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of significant coverage from independent sources. Corpx 02:49, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Like Danaman5, I too am a trekkie, but this doesn't belong here. I could provide references for the layout of the room with respect to the rest of the ship - I've got some blueprints of the ships at home - but that doesn't change the fact that this is essentially fancruft. And the blueprints wouldn't be independent anyway. There's not even need to transwiki it to Memory Alpha, as they already have a much better article. Delete as fancruft and non-notable. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 03:25, 5 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.