Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obsessive psychogeography


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:56, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Obsessive psychogeography

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Appears to be completely original research. There are no mentions of this to be found anywhere else on the internet. Proposed deletion was contested. -- Lear's Fool 05:23, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  --   -- Lear's Fool 05:25, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Unreferenced, and I could find no references from reliable sources. It seems likely that it is made up as some sort of tongue-in-cheek joke. Cullen328 (talk) 06:06, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. The author, Tclark1755, writes on the article's Talk page, "I am trying to introduce a type of cartography/mapmaking/artist practice called obsessive geography". There are only 3 genuine Google hits for this term, two of which are for its as a tag for a a video by Tim Clark and photos by tclark1755. Wikipedia content is required to be verifiable. Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Qwfp (talk) 06:22, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Unambiguous attempt to use Wikipedia to publicise something made up. Original research in Wikipedia's sense, but in real life terms to call it "research" is to flatter it. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:59, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. "Obsessive psychogeography" a term recently introduced via a blog by someone called Tim Clark. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:00, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete This could arguably qualify as unremarkable web content, but I suppose AfD works well enough. The Blade of the Northern Lights  ( 話して下さい ) 04:50, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.