Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obstacles to a democratic world government


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete-- JForget 00:21, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Obstacles to a democratic world government

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This would make a very lovely school essay, but seems to be utterly unsourced WP:OR. Also has some severe POV issues. ARended Winter 23:20, 8 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:NOR and WP:NPOV Rackabello 23:36, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above... but good luck on the campaign Mandsford 02:21, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as screedcruft. --Jayron32| talk | contribs 03:13, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NPOV. This is obviously opinionated. J- ſtan TalkContribs 03:59, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NOT --Phirazo 19:22, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. ff m  23:54, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete SOAP, OR, NPOV. Also poorly written. CRGreathouse (t | c) 01:50, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: Fascinating concept, but the article is written as if it is arguing for it, rather than providing a neutral discussion of the topic. If there are actually sources written on the topic, then perhaps an article could exist, i.e. one that cites these sources, but we really should not have articles arguing for the creation of something as the article does in its conclusion: "In conclusion, the best way to help the underprivileged is to establish a democratic world government."  So, I tend to agree with the original research/point of view problems cited above in this instance.  Sincerely, --  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 16:47, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * CommentThere is already an article on World government. I see nothing to merge here though. --Phirazo 18:07, 10 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.