Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ocean Finance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Merge & Redirect (closed by non-admin) per my explanation below and WP:BOLD RMHED (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Ocean Finance

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I created this article myself a while back, but I'm not sure it's truly any more notable than any of the other companies which offer the same sort of thing. I'm putting it to AfD to see if people can see if it's notable or not. h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 01:58, 17 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete: After a Google News search, I don't think this is a notable company. There are over 400 hits on that search, but most of them are not related to this company. - Rjd0060 (talk) 02:02, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Put it in quotes and you get 5 google news hits, that's the better way to do it.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 02:04, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: Whoops, I usually do, but forgot this time. - Rjd0060 (talk) 02:05, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Delete Just another annoying T.V loan company that wants to get people in to unecessarry debt--Lucy-marie (talk) 15:09, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom and Rjd.   jj137  ( Talk ) 02:06, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. If I have to watch another advert for Ocean Finance... R udget zŋ 12:41, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to the parent company American International Group. RMHED (talk) 14:33, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge as per RMHED It is a evil loans company, but it is notable by its size and geographic distribution. scope_creep (talk) 20:19, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I've merged and redirected as this way nothing is lost, Ocean are a notable/notorious ("ocean finance" gets over 300,000 ghits) company and users should at least get redirected to something useful. RMHED (talk) 00:39, 19 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.