Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oceanarium Bournemouth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:33, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Oceanarium Bournemouth

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of any notability. Substantial COI editing with much puffery,. Sources are mostly own web-site plus a few very local which are probably press releases. Tagging for notability and inadequate sourcing has only encouraged more puffery and peacock text. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk 10:44, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions.  Velella  Velella Talk  10:44, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Velella  Velella Talk  10:44, 13 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment These seems to be reasonably independant, at least:. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:43, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Have edited the page to remove a lot of the puffery but believe their is a COI here and not currently enough independent, quality sources to demonstrate notability Dexxtrall (talk) 11:55, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment I have now decided to admit this article into the Diehard Article Hospital. I will add high-quality spurces and probably revamp it. I will replace/recreate the page when I consider the article ready for publishing. If you want to discuss this, please go to User talk:A diehard editor/Diehard Article Hospital/Oceanarium Bournemouth —Preceding undated comment added 12:36, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Draftify based on above. Currently I think the sourcing is just below the bar for notability. If the editor wants to have another go at finding better sources, then that's fine, but unless that happens within the next week, article should at least be moved out of mainspace. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:48, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Draftify. Given the COI and the fact that the article needs lots of work done, either moving it to Draft:Oceanarium Bournemouth or "blowing it up and starting over" should be sufficient in solving the article's problems. a quick search turned up a few results, I think enough to pass GNG. ––Redditaddict69 (talk) (contribs)  18:17, 20 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.