Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oceanic Airlines (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Star  Mississippi  00:56, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Oceanic Airlines
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

A gross compilation of WP:OR. If you were to remove all of it, there would be nothing left to keep, and justifies deletion. If this were to be sourced to reliable sources, there would only be trivial mentions related to a singular TV series, would fail WP:SIGCOV and WP:NOTPLOT. Jontesta (talk) 23:54, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Jontesta (talk) 23:54, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per clear and overwhelming consensus to keep in the two previous AFDs that used similar nomination rationales. RecycledPixels (talk) 08:08, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Previously mentioned RS in the last discussion include Adweek, The Wayfarer's Handbook, and Hartford Courant among others, another one that was added to the article was The Aircraft-Spotter's Companion. These are significant coverage of the subject. See also WP:NEXIST. The Appearances section can mostly be removed if necessary; but this is an article in need of improvement and not deletion. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:01, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes WP:SIGCOV per the sources produced in the previous AFDs. This should not have been re-nominated.4meter4 (talk) 16:30, 24 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.