Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oceanit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete  Eluchil404 17:42, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Oceanit

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears to be a non-notable company. Tagged with notability since February 2007 with no significant improvements. Hawaiian717 22:14, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - I have to potential sources here. & . --  Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor  ( tαlk ) 23:32, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per The Random Editor. --Aarktica 21:46, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not adequately explain the core business of the company, or what its expertise is. Current references are very weak. I would not object to re-creation of a better article, but this company does not pass any criteria for intrinsic notability. So unless its notability is shown from sources, I don't see why it should be kept. The Random Editor's potential sources are interesting, but (1) there is no mention of any actual contract with the government for SWARM, (2) the concrete nanotube thing is only a grant application. EdJohnston 01:11, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The article simply does not assert the notability of the company. We can probably all agree that it exists, but that, in itself, does not make it notable. Fails WP:CORP. --Evb-wiki 15:12, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.