Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oceanpayment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  → Call me  Hahc  21  04:59, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Oceanpayment

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-nontable company. Can't find coverage in sources. Stickee (talk) 05:35, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 12:05, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 12:05, 19 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Passes company notability threshold. In depth coverage here,here and here. Philg88 ♦talk 14:58, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable company, covered by a number of third party sources. More sources can be discovered through baidu, a Chinese search engine.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 15:24, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 23:26, 27 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Reliable sources exist for this article. I'm not able to find many in English, but sources in non-English languages are perfectly valid. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:48, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.