Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oceans of Kansas (book)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn. SL93 (talk) 00:23, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Oceans of Kansas (book)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I found no significant coverage. The article is only two sentences with no claim to notability. Fails WP:BK. SL93 (talk) 23:31, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, oh my god does the "Find sources" template need a JSTOR parameter. Got four reviews in top-quality sources right here. It's also frequently (I think?) cited. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 00:08, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I never use the find sources link and I've never heard of JSTOR. I see that it is notable and I better withdraw before some weirdo says that it's common sense to know about that search engine. SL93 (talk) 00:20, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.