Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ochuko Tonukari (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deleted per WP:CSD Dloh cierekim  01:52, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Ochuko Tonukari
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Delete. WP:G4 (see Articles for deletion/Ochuko Tonukari) is the specific WP:CSD rationale here. To avoid unnecessary to and fro, one rule ignored and sent to WP:AfD again. With greatest respect to the subject of the article, there appears to be nothing in evidence to displace the result of the first AfD.--Shirt58 (talk) 13:39, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as already deleted and vanity article, does not even bother to assert notability. JoshuSasori (talk) 13:35, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. There would appear to me to some assertion of notability in the article as it currently stands, though unsubstantiated.--Shirt58 (talk) 13:52, 24 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete - articles fails to establish notability - the article fails WP:AUTHOR, WP:GNG, WP:RS and WP:V. the six external links in the article are all unreliable or self-published sources. Amsaim (talk) 16:02, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Now wait one minute. Why are we at afd w/ this? I got some real grief for sending one of these to AFD instead of just speedying a couple of years ago. Is my understanding wrong again on my first night back? My understanding is G4's get speedied and if there is appeal based on sourcing it goes to WP:DRV. Well i do have access to the old version, and I don't see this version as improved enough. Dloh  cierekim  01:24, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.