Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ockham's Razor (bands)

The result of the debate was delete [added by Andre🚐 23:40, 15 August 2022 (UTC) for afdstats]

Ockham's Razor (bands)
We don't have articles on these bands - it's just a useless link respository. Delete, and perhaps add a minor footnote to Occam's Razor regarding the popularity of it for band names. Andre ( talk )A| 03:40, Nov 28, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Agree with the nomination. Just a link repository with no content.  It is also a misnamed article itself.  Geogre 14:49, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, it's just external links. - Cdc 21:27, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. It is the extension of the disambiguation comment at the top of Occam's Razor.  We certainly don't want those links coming back into that article.  Rossami (talk) 01:42, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Then delete all mention of the band(s). In either case, Delete --Improv 06:48, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. "Keeping the names of rock groups is not in context with the rest of Wikipedia."
 * Keep. The more information the better.
 * Keep as disambig page. anthony &#35686;&#21578; 18:37, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: not an article. WP != link farm. Wile E. Heresiarch 20:32, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Disambig it!&mdash;Trevor Caira 21:27, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Comment. We can't disambiguate this article because we don't have articles for the bands mentioned on it! They're all external links. The bands themselves aren't notable enough to have their own articles, either. Andre ( talk )A| 21:47, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's just a list of external links. Out of five links, one is 404, and three point to sites that are no longer maintained. PRiis 01:48, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)