Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/October 26 1993


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   NO CONSENSUS Default to Keep Mike Cline (talk) 03:37, 6 March 2010 (UTC) ==October 26 1993==
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails notability criteria - lacks significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. One passing mention is hardly significant. 76.102.12.35 (talk) 21:05, 11 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep This work is pretty well known and easily meets the notability criteria. It has been referenced in numerous non-trivial contexts (I will get some more of them added to the page over the coming few days.Experianzer (talk) 22:38, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:50, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete This article is pretty much an orphan, and I question its notability. 209.196.230.72 (talk) 00:41, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 04:09, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep This work meets wikipedia guidelines for notability but the article requires some serious attention!--Diminster (talk) 08:59, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, C T J F 8 3  GoUSA 01:26, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete for lack of secondary sources. Keep in mind that the only two "keep" !voters have just argued WP:ITSNOTABLE without anything else, so they're just talking the talk. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 02:23, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment It has just been created a few weeks ago. Perhaps more time should be given? Bejinhan  Talk   04:42, 25 February 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.