Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Odessa People's Republic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, WP:SNOW, qualifies for speedy deletion--Ymblanter (talk) 10:19, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Odessa People's Republic

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable, proven to be a hoax, already have a main article for all pro-Russian protests so this split is not necessary. Львівське (говорити) 23:49, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 17 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Whether WP:HOAX to WP:TOOSOON (if real), it does not belong (or yet)— &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  01:18, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - This clearly grounds for speedy deletion, as it was a blatant hoax, as described by Pravda. RGloucester  — ☎ 01:58, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - This has been deemed as a WP:HOAX per this source the opposition group In Odessa have made no such claim. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 02:48, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment I have merged the info to 2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 02:58, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as the article states "...created on April 16, 2014 by a pro-Russian internet group". Jesus wept.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 06:57, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.