Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Odhava


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SNOWBALL. Safiel (talk) 15:15, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Odhava

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG, a Google search only turns up information about its post office. Citrusbowler (talk) (contribs) (email me)  19:49, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Wikipedia is a gazetteer, and by long-standing consensus all verifiable populated places are considered notable. Since this place has a post office, it's verifiable. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 21:03, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - if there's a post office, it's an officially recognized, populated place, and so should be kept by WP:NGEO. Needs to be sourced, though. Ansh666 21:34, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:45, 18 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep: Google Maps shows it. §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ {T/C} 03:50, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep: It is a village. SL93 (talk) 08:23, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep and an admonishment to the nominator who failed WP:BEFORE - the only thing wrong with the article was a lack of sources, but alas you found one including a reference to a post office. But, rather than adding the source and recognizing it met WP:GEO, you went ahead and nominated it for deletion. A repetition of such disruptive behavior will not be tolerated. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 05:13, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.