Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Odin's Court


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 06:48, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Odin&

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Though there are numerous sources listed, the only sources with non-trivial coverage do not appear to meet reliable sources guidelines (i.e., non-notable music website). OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:51, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete as I see the same, no reliable sources even though there are numerous hits. Also, I think this article is very poor written and could changed, but would much rather save the time to delete instead of somebody making a 2nd Nomination for this artice to go to AFD. Hairy  Perry  15:56, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:53, 26 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I should note to Mr. HairyPerry that an article is only subject for deletion if it is utterly unsalvageable. I'm not entirely sure that the band meets the applicable standard, but I am sure that "it needs a rewrite" is not grounds for deletion. We can have all the AfDs we want about "poorly written" and each will be closed with prejudice. Still, gnews reports no obvious hits that I can find which are not certainly trivial. Though there is yet research to be done, I've yet to find specific grounds for inclusion. 74.224.47.231 (talk) 16:56, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Additionally, more of a question. Two notable musicians, Tom S. Englund of Evergrey and Tony Kakko of Sonata Arctica do guest work on this album. This does not technically qualify them per criterion 6, though it might be of consideration in itself. My opinion at this point, though, is that while the band may be on the brink of notability, it's just there just yet. When they headline a major tour or release a second album which is not self-financed (albums up to Deathanity were self-financed according to the RockTimes.de reference in the article), they may squeeze past WP:BAND, but for now, I don't have a good reason to object to deletion. --Same fellow as above, 74.224.47.231 (talk) 18:34, 27 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete: as per nominator. JamesBurns (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 05:07, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mgm|(talk) 12:28, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Article fails notability guidelines. L0b0t (talk) 15:31, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.