Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OdinMs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Punkmorten (talk) 08:51, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

OdinMs

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested speedy deletion; see restoration debate at Deletion review/Log/2008 July 20. Some very limited sources are listed there. This is a procedural and neutral nomination. Chick Bowen 02:07, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete- there are some hits on google that verify the existence of this company, and the law suit. Nevertheless I'm not sure any of this establishes notability. The article seems to contain a great deal of wailing about a perceived injustice and Wikipedia's not the place for that. Reyk  YO!  02:54, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per nom. Distinctly non-notable, and fails WP:A. WP is not the place to solve legal disputes, or to shout about commercial injustices. Ohconfucius (talk) 03:21, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, makes multiple unsourced claims.  Black  ngold29   04:53, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as insufficiently notable. This "private server project" has not been the subject of non-trivial coverage by reliable sources. — Satori Son 14:00, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, can't find any coverage anywhere other than blogs and forums, Google News has nothing, notability has not been established. And, as all above have stated, Wikipedia is not a soapbox. --Stormie (talk) 23:32, 29 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.