Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Odlid!


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 01:28, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Odlid!

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Can't see how this meets WP:MUSIC guidelines. Did not release albums on well-known labels, etc. Punkmorten 17:48, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Clever name for a band, though. (Spell it backwards.)--Sethacus 20:21, 12 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Indeed a clever and silly name, but clever and silly != notable.  Punkmorten is right, fails WP:MUSIC.  Gotta go.  Sorry, guys. --63.64.30.2 22:30, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Very clever. NN.  - Rjd0060 22:48, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Arguably counts under WP:MUSIC #6 given James Zahn connection. If not kept, re-direct and merge to Zahn. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.99.181.80 (talk) 15:24, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's completely unreferenced. -- Mikeblas 12:52, 15 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.