Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Of Mice And Magic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Dave Wolverton. J04n(talk page) 14:55, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Of Mice And Magic

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Book fails to meet WP: GNG. Alles Klar, Herr Kommisar  04:16, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to David_Farland. I did a search and other than two reviews from Kirkus and the SLJ, I was unable to find anything to show that this book is notable outside of its author. I was going to see if there was enough for perhaps a series entry, but I can't really even find enough sources to justify that. It's better to just redirect this to the author for now and perhaps in the future if he releases further books that gain reviews, we can create a series entry. But right now? There's not enough out there for this book to pass WP:NBOOK.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:53, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 3 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 12:56, 9 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge to David Farland; there's enough info in the cited reviews to produce a paragraph or so in his article (and people may later add a bit about other books in the series - there's a review of the third here), but the book doesn't seem to be independently notable. --Colapeninsula (talk) 12:06, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Move to Ravenspell series - given that there's a review for the third book, it seems as if the series as a whole might squeak by notability. Caseylf (talk) 21:21, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.