Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Of Mice and Men in popular culture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Snow keep signfificant sourcing has been found and there was no proposal for deletion. Merging discussions need to take place on the articles' talk page. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 16:14, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Of Mice and Men in popular culture

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is just a cluttered trivial dumping ground. Relevant contents belong in the Of Mice and Men article only. RobJ1981 (talk) 23:32, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions.   — Lenticel  ( talk ) 23:58, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I discovered this AfD when I came to merge notable content back into Of Mice and Men. Now that I'm looking at the article tho, there won't be much content to merge, just that "tell me again about the rabbits" and the archetypes of the two characters are frequently referenced. -- Nick Penguin ( contribs ) 00:01, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand, there will be more when people have a chance to work on it. I think that for notable works, the default should not be to merge the content. what the nom thinks to be trivia is actually cultural influences, and the use of the theme subsequently is perhaps as ultimately important as the work itself. DGG (talk) 02:33, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep The nomination proposes merger not deletion. Colonel Warden (talk) 07:49, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - it's a perfectly good "pop culture" article. Bearian (talk) 15:05, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * In less than 20 minutes, I've found 5 cites and added them. Bearian (talk) 15:26, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * In less than 25 more minutes, I've found many more references, from blogs to the New York Times. Please, can another sysop lay this AfD to rest? Bearian (talk) 15:51, 17 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep - Definitely notable per Bearian. Snowball is on it's way.... D.M.N. (talk) 16:00, 17 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.