Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Of the Subcontract


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. After improvements to the article had been made, there was a consensus to keep the article.

This indicates that the deletion arguments may not have considered WP:NEXIST sufficiently. Subsequently, less weight are given to them, which is sufficient for a keep consensus to exist. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 10:25, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Of the Subcontract

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:SOAP advert, no evidence of notability, 2 sources are author's website, 1 a book he wrote. Acousmana 15:07, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:GNG, all primary sources, not notable Bobbysirchism (talk) 17:12, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. <b style="color:#552586">Ac</b><b style="color:#804fb3">ou</b><b style="color:#9969c7">s</b><b style="color:#b589d6">m</b><b style="color:#9969c7">a</b><b style="color:#804fb3">n</b><b style="color:#6a359c">a</b> 15:07, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:38, 15 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. I really didn't expect to find enough, but some scraping for sourcing in the academic databases and such found that this has been discussed surprisingly extensively. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:46, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep GNG would seem to be met by, , , contributed to by , all sources in the article, probably added by RotP Eddie891 Talk Work 15:41, 16 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep, meets WP:NBOOK/WP:GNG, as brought out by above editors, and reflected in its wikiarticle, has also been used/studied in academic studies ie. see 2015 stanford uni unit description here. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:25, 18 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.