Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Off The Wall (mangas)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 23:09, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Off The Wall (mangas)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

no assertion of notability whatsoever Wuh  Wuz  Dat  04:08, 9 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:N - A quick google search brings up next to nothing, most results are just to do with the phrase off the wall. On of the top google results is actually the nom article which can't be good. -- Cabe  6403  (Talk•Sign) 14:36, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I'd expect sources would be in Japanese, not English, but I'm not finding any in Japanese, either. The infobox is clearly an edited version of the one at Kirarin Revolution, copying most of the information there.  The claim of 100 episodes since January 7th is wildly unlikely, it would require on episode appearing on Japanese TV every 2 days.  Clearly a hoax. Edward321 (talk) 17:41, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Cannot find any references to prove that this is anything other than a hoax. This doesn't appear to be the only such article created by the editor. --DAJF (talk) 05:24, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as probably hoax. 159.182.1.4 (talk) 12:55, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete While Kirarin Revolution is the name of an anime series, it is based off of a manga of the same name, written and illustrated by An Nakahara and not Ritsuko Kawai. In fact, the infobox is a near exact copy. This leads me to conclude that this article is a hoax. I'll also note that another other article that the original author created is also a blatant hoax. --Farix (Talk) 13:39, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, haox -- and not a very well crafted one. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:09, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Hoax and not a good one but we saw worse. --KrebMarkt 15:09, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I could find nothing on the subject either, id mark it as a hoax here. — Knowledgekid87 (talk) 13:30, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - a definite hoax, considering the series supposedly has 14 volumes. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 20:34, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.